Central American vs West Indian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Central American
West Indian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Central Americans
West Indians
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American vs West Indian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,924,730 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 16.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,168 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of West Indians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 0.87%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Central American | West Indian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 7.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 35.3% |
| Range | 98.8% | 27.4% |
| Mean | 20.2% | 15.7% |
| Median | 16.9% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.2% | 18.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.8% | 5.9% |
Demographics Similar to Central Americans and West Indians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Bangladeshi (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Bahamas (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |