Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Czechoslovakian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Czechoslovakians
19.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
194th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Czechoslovakian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,207,874 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.272 and weighted average of 19.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 361,916,280 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.330 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 9.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 5.0% | 7.4% |
Maximum | 32.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.5% | 92.6% |
Mean | 17.2% | 33.3% |
Median | 17.6% | 25.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.3% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 39.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 21.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 21.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Scotland (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (19.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and Albanian (19.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Peruvians | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Russia | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Albanians | 99.3 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 99.3 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.3 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Taiwanese | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 19.4% |
Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Nicaraguan (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (21.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Japanese (21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 27.1 /100 | #196 | Fair 21.3% |
Japanese | 26.4 /100 | #197 | Fair 21.3% |
Swiss | 24.2 /100 | #198 | Fair 21.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 22.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 21.4% |
Irish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 21.4% |
Nigerians | 20.9 /100 | #201 | Fair 21.4% |