Samoan vs Guamanian/Chamorro Male Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Guamanian/Chamorro
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Guamanians/Chamorros
10.9%
MALE POVERTY
71.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
67.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Guamanian/Chamorro Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,058,260 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.191 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,842,342 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.50%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Guamanian/Chamorro |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.76% |
| Maximum | 37.9% | 40.6% |
| Range | 37.3% | 39.9% |
| Mean | 11.5% | 12.3% |
| Median | 10.0% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Guamanians/Chamorros by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (10.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Venezuelan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Venezuela (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Icelander (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 67.9 /100 | #149 | Good 11.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 67.6 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
| Venezuelans | 67.4 /100 | #151 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 67.3 /100 | #152 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 65.2 /100 | #153 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 64.8 /100 | #154 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 64.7 /100 | #155 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.9 /100 | #156 | Good 11.0% |
| Scotch-Irish | 63.7 /100 | #157 | Good 11.0% |