Belgian vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Belgian
Romanian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Belgians
Romanians
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
93.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Belgian vs Romanian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,783,790 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Belgians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.568 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 369,938,935 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.89%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Belgian | Romanian |
Minimum | 0.93% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 29.6% | 70.0% |
Range | 28.6% | 66.0% |
Mean | 11.2% | 23.0% |
Median | 11.4% | 16.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.2% | 28.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.8% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.6% | 19.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Belgians and Romanians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Belgians are Sri Lankan (15.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (15.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Denmark (15.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and Palestinian (15.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Chilean (15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), British (15.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from South Africa (15.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.7 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Paraguayans | 95.7 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.6 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 95.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 15.0% |
British | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Romanians | 95.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | England | 95.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Chileans | 95.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 95.0 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 94.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Serbians | 94.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 94.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Palestinians | 94.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 94.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Dutch | 94.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Sri Lankans | 94.0 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Belgians | 93.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.3 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 93.1 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.7 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.5 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.3% |