Apache vs Lumbee Female Poverty
COMPARE
Apache
Lumbee
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Apache
Lumbee
19.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Apache vs Lumbee Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,999,825 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413 and weighted average of 19.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,229 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of 23.5%, a difference of 22.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Apache | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 81.8% | 65.5% |
| Range | 77.7% | 63.6% |
| Mean | 31.0% | 28.4% |
| Median | 24.6% | 28.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 18.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.7% | 35.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.5% | 17.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.3% | 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Apache and Lumbee by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Native/Alaskan (19.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Dominican (19.1%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (19.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Kiowa (18.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and Black/African American (18.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pima (23.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.0%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 7.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |