Albanian vs Ethiopian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Albanian
Ethiopian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Albanians
Ethiopians
8.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.8%
FAMILY POVERTY
66.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Albanian vs Ethiopian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,873,103 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Albanians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 8.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,923,037 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.011 and weighted average of 8.8%, a difference of 3.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Albanian | Ethiopian |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 12.5% | 24.9% |
| Range | 11.1% | 23.5% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 8.5% |
| Median | 7.1% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Albanians and Ethiopians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Albanians are Immigrants from Germany (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belarus (8.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Jordan (8.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and Scotch-Irish (8.6%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (8.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (8.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Hungarian (8.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Peruvian (8.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and White/Caucasian (8.8%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.3 /100 | #143 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Albanians | 83.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 83.2 /100 | #145 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.0 /100 | #147 | Excellent 8.5% |
| Scotch-Irish | 82.2 /100 | #148 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Mongolians | 80.4 /100 | #149 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Syrians | 80.3 /100 | #150 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Brazilians | 80.1 /100 | #151 | Excellent 8.6% |
| Samoans | 79.8 /100 | #152 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 79.1 /100 | #153 | Good 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 75.4 /100 | #154 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 73.6 /100 | #155 | Good 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 71.2 /100 | #156 | Good 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 69.3 /100 | #157 | Good 8.8% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 69.1 /100 | #158 | Good 8.8% |
| Peruvians | 68.0 /100 | #159 | Good 8.8% |
| Hungarians | 67.2 /100 | #160 | Good 8.8% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 66.9 /100 | #161 | Good 8.8% |
| Ethiopians | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 8.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 66.0 /100 | #163 | Good 8.8% |