Alaskan Athabascan vs Menominee Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Menominee
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Menominee
16.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
314th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Menominee Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,419,805 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,140,338 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.310 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 10.0%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Menominee |
Minimum | 4.3% | 3.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 53.7% |
Range | 95.7% | 49.8% |
Mean | 32.4% | 22.1% |
Median | 28.6% | 16.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.2% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.5% | 32.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.2% | 22.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.3% | 15.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.9% | 15.2% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Menominee by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Cheyenne (16.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.19%), Cherokee (16.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Seminole (16.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and Comanche (16.0%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Central American Indian (17.2%, a difference of 2.7%), Kiowa (18.3%, a difference of 3.3%), Colville (18.4%, a difference of 4.0%), Choctaw (17.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (16.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 15.9% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 17.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.3% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 19.1% |