Alaskan Athabascan vs Menominee Male Disability
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
 Menominee
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Menominee
14.9%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.0%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Menominee Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,820,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.160 and weighted average of 14.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,777,737 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 15.0%, a difference of 0.51%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Menominee | 
| Minimum | 5.8% | 1.6% | 
| Maximum | 50.7% | 53.0% | 
| Range | 44.9% | 51.5% | 
| Mean | 20.7% | 19.7% | 
| Median | 18.5% | 17.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.9% | 11.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.7% | 23.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 11.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 11.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 11.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Menominee by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.46%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 0.49%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.62%), Yuman (14.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and Seminole (14.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Menominee are Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 0.91%), Dutch West Indian (14.8%, a difference of 0.97%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 15.1%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 15.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 16.5%  |