Soviet Union vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Soviet Union
Chickasaw
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,512,203 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.358 and weighted average of 85.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 5.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 78.7% | 39.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 21.3% | 61.0% |
Mean | 86.7% | 77.5% |
Median | 85.8% | 78.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 83.9% | 73.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 88.6% | 82.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 9.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Turkish (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Croatia (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kenya (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chinese (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Thais | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Taiwanese | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Turks | 99.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Soviet Union | 99.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.5 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Chinese | 99.4 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Slovaks | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Serbians | 99.4 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Albanians | 99.4 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 99.3 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 81.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 81.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 81.5% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.4% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 80.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 80.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 80.7% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 80.6% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 80.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 80.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 80.4% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.2% |