Cheyenne vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Cheyenne
 Chickasaw
 In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Cheyenne
Chickasaw
79.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cheyenne vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,703,463 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.059 and weighted average of 79.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,707,163 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.100 and weighted average of 80.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cheyenne | Chickasaw | 
| Minimum | 51.7% | 39.0% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 48.3% | 61.0% | 
| Mean | 77.6% | 77.5% | 
| Median | 78.2% | 78.4% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 68.3% | 73.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.4% | 82.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 9.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 12.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 12.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Cheyenne and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Cheyenne are Houma (79.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Ute (79.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Menominee (79.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Kiowa (79.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and Creek (80.0%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Inupiat (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Puerto Rican (80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Paiute (80.6%, a difference of 0.35%), Yaqui (80.5%, a difference of 0.46%), and Choctaw (80.5%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315  | Tragic 81.5%  | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #316  | Tragic 81.5%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317  | Tragic 81.4%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318  | Tragic 81.3%  | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319  | Tragic 80.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #320  | Tragic 80.9%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #321  | Tragic 80.7%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #322  | Tragic 80.6%  | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #323  | Tragic 80.5%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324  | Tragic 80.5%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 80.4%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 80.2%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 80.0%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 79.7%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 79.5%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 79.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 79.2%  | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 79.0%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 78.9%  |