Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indianapolis
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis

4.0%
80.5%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 46204 80.5% 29.9% (+50.6)#8 35.2% (+45.3)#659
2. 46216 73.8% 29.9% (+43.9)#12 35.2% (+38.6)#878
3. 46202 70.2% 29.9% (+40.3)#15 35.2% (+35.0)#1,051
4. 46224 63.1% 29.9% (+33.2)#20 35.2% (+27.9)#1,543
5. 46250 58.4% 29.9% (+28.5)#25 35.2% (+23.2)#1,950
6. 46226 55.9% 29.9% (+26.1)#34 35.2% (+20.8)#2,217
7. 46227 55.5% 29.9% (+25.6)#35 35.2% (+20.3)#2,271
8. 46201 55.0% 29.9% (+25.1)#38 35.2% (+19.8)#2,341
9. 46222 54.9% 29.9% (+25.0)#39 35.2% (+19.7)#2,358
10. 46240 54.8% 29.9% (+24.9)#40 35.2% (+19.6)#2,369
11. 46254 54.4% 29.9% (+24.5)#41 35.2% (+19.2)#2,417
12. 46218 53.6% 29.9% (+23.7)#43 35.2% (+18.4)#2,531
13. 46214 52.4% 29.9% (+22.6)#47 35.2% (+17.3)#2,708
14. 46268 51.9% 29.9% (+22.0)#49 35.2% (+16.7)#2,777
15. 46260 51.2% 29.9% (+21.3)#52 35.2% (+16.0)#2,906
16. 46235 49.2% 29.9% (+19.3)#56 35.2% (+14.0)#3,236
17. 46208 47.8% 29.9% (+18.0)#58 35.2% (+12.7)#3,478
18. 46225 47.5% 29.9% (+17.6)#59 35.2% (+12.3)#3,544
19. 46205 47.3% 29.9% (+17.4)#61 35.2% (+12.1)#3,580
20. 46241 43.7% 29.9% (+13.8)#71 35.2% (+8.49)#4,402
21. 46203 42.3% 29.9% (+12.4)#78 35.2% (+7.07)#4,768
22. 46219 41.3% 29.9% (+11.4)#81 35.2% (+6.13)#5,015
23. 46221 40.0% 29.9% (+10.2)#85 35.2% (+4.85)#5,394
24. 46229 38.9% 29.9% (+9.04)#91 35.2% (+3.74)#5,747
25. 46280 38.4% 29.9% (+8.49)#96 35.2% (+3.19)#5,958
26. 46220 35.9% 29.9% (+6.01)#116 35.2% (+0.716)#6,942
27. 46237 31.3% 29.9% (+1.38)#160 35.2% (-3.92)#9,284
28. 46256 28.0% 29.9% (-1.84)#198 35.2% (-7.14)#11,375
29. 46231 22.3% 29.9% (-7.59)#307 35.2% (-12.9)#16,076
30. 46228 18.9% 29.9% (-10.9)#398 35.2% (-16.2)#19,232
31. 46217 18.6% 29.9% (-11.2)#410 35.2% (-16.5)#19,536
32. 46234 17.9% 29.9% (-12.0)#432 35.2% (-17.3)#20,247
33. 46239 17.1% 29.9% (-12.8)#458 35.2% (-18.1)#21,043
34. 46236 12.5% 29.9% (-17.4)#578 35.2% (-22.7)#25,416
35. 46278 5.9% 29.9% (-24.0)#691 35.2% (-29.3)#29,703
36. 46259 4.0% 29.9% (-25.9)#715 35.2% (-31.2)#30,453

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN are:
#1
80.5%
#2
73.8%
#3
70.2%
#4
63.1%
#5
58.4%
#6
55.9%
#7
55.5%
#8
55.0%
#9
54.9%
#10
54.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN?
46204 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN with 80.5%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis is 45.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indiana?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indiana is 29.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.