Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Indianapolis
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis

80.5%
4.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 46259 4.0% 29.9% (-25.9)#19 35.2% (-31.2)#649
2. 46278 5.9% 29.9% (-24.0)#43 35.2% (-29.3)#1,399
3. 46236 12.5% 29.9% (-17.4)#156 35.2% (-22.7)#5,686
4. 46239 17.1% 29.9% (-12.8)#276 35.2% (-18.1)#10,059
5. 46234 17.9% 29.9% (-12.0)#302 35.2% (-17.3)#10,855
6. 46217 18.6% 29.9% (-11.2)#324 35.2% (-16.5)#11,566
7. 46228 18.9% 29.9% (-10.9)#336 35.2% (-16.2)#11,870
8. 46231 22.3% 29.9% (-7.59)#427 35.2% (-12.9)#15,026
9. 46256 28.0% 29.9% (-1.84)#536 35.2% (-7.14)#19,727
10. 46237 31.3% 29.9% (+1.38)#574 35.2% (-3.92)#21,818
11. 46220 35.9% 29.9% (+6.01)#618 35.2% (+0.716)#24,160
12. 46280 38.4% 29.9% (+8.49)#638 35.2% (+3.19)#25,144
13. 46229 38.9% 29.9% (+9.04)#643 35.2% (+3.74)#25,355
14. 46221 40.0% 29.9% (+10.2)#649 35.2% (+4.85)#25,708
15. 46219 41.3% 29.9% (+11.4)#653 35.2% (+6.13)#26,087
16. 46203 42.3% 29.9% (+12.4)#656 35.2% (+7.07)#26,334
17. 46241 43.7% 29.9% (+13.8)#663 35.2% (+8.49)#26,700
18. 46205 47.3% 29.9% (+17.4)#673 35.2% (+12.1)#27,522
19. 46225 47.5% 29.9% (+17.6)#675 35.2% (+12.3)#27,558
20. 46208 47.8% 29.9% (+18.0)#676 35.2% (+12.7)#27,624
21. 46235 49.2% 29.9% (+19.3)#678 35.2% (+14.0)#27,866
22. 46260 51.2% 29.9% (+21.3)#682 35.2% (+16.0)#28,196
23. 46268 51.9% 29.9% (+22.0)#685 35.2% (+16.7)#28,325
24. 46214 52.4% 29.9% (+22.6)#687 35.2% (+17.3)#28,394
25. 46218 53.6% 29.9% (+23.7)#691 35.2% (+18.4)#28,571
26. 46254 54.4% 29.9% (+24.5)#693 35.2% (+19.2)#28,685
27. 46240 54.8% 29.9% (+24.9)#694 35.2% (+19.6)#28,733
28. 46222 54.9% 29.9% (+25.0)#695 35.2% (+19.7)#28,744
29. 46201 55.0% 29.9% (+25.1)#696 35.2% (+19.8)#28,761
30. 46227 55.5% 29.9% (+25.6)#699 35.2% (+20.3)#28,831
31. 46226 55.9% 29.9% (+26.1)#700 35.2% (+20.8)#28,885
32. 46250 58.4% 29.9% (+28.5)#709 35.2% (+23.2)#29,152
33. 46224 63.1% 29.9% (+33.2)#714 35.2% (+27.9)#29,559
34. 46202 70.2% 29.9% (+40.3)#719 35.2% (+35.0)#30,051
35. 46216 73.8% 29.9% (+43.9)#722 35.2% (+38.6)#30,224
36. 46204 80.5% 29.9% (+50.6)#726 35.2% (+45.3)#30,443

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN are:
#1
0.0%
#2
4.0%
#3
5.9%
#4
12.5%
#5
17.1%
#6
17.9%
#7
18.6%
#8
18.9%
#9
22.3%
#10
28.0%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN?
46259 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN with 4.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis, IN?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indianapolis is 45.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indiana?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Indiana is 29.9%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.