Osage vs Subsaharan African Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Osage
Subsaharan African
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Osage
Sub-Saharan Africans
46.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
73.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Subsaharan African Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 46.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,572,233 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 41.6%, a difference of 12.7%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 35.1% | 11.8% |
| Maximum | 68.9% | 72.3% |
| Range | 33.8% | 60.5% |
| Mean | 51.3% | 38.7% |
| Median | 49.4% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.5% | 34.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.3% | 43.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 9.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.3% | 11.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Osage by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Nonimmigrants (46.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iraqi (46.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Oceania (46.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Delaware (46.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Armenian (46.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Serbians | 76.3 /100 | #152 | Good 47.0% |
| Hmong | 76.2 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 76.1 /100 | #154 | Good 46.9% |
| Arabs | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 46.9% |
| Armenians | 75.4 /100 | #156 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 73.3 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
| Osage | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
| Iraqis | 71.7 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
| Delaware | 71.2 /100 | #161 | Good 46.8% |
| Colombians | 71.0 /100 | #162 | Good 46.8% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 70.2 /100 | #163 | Good 46.8% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 46.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 69.9 /100 | #165 | Good 46.8% |
| Cherokee | 65.7 /100 | #166 | Good 46.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |