Osage vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
 Subsaharan African
 Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Osage
Sub-Saharan Africans
9.7%
FAMILY POVERTY
8.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Subsaharan African Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,772,722 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.233 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,098,570 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.508 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 11.6%.
 
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 0.88% | 0.78% | 
| Maximum | 24.4% | 62.5% | 
| Range | 23.6% | 61.7% | 
| Mean | 10.3% | 15.6% | 
| Median | 9.8% | 11.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 9.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 18.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 9.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 11.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 11.0% | 
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Micronesia (9.8%, a difference of 0.58%), Nonimmigrants (9.8%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Thailand (9.7%, a difference of 0.63%), Moroccan (9.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and American (9.8%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty | 
| Immigrants | South America | 18.0 /100 | #206  | Poor 9.5%  | 
| Sierra Leoneans | 15.6 /100 | #207  | Poor 9.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 15.1 /100 | #208  | Poor 9.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #209  | Poor 9.5%  | 
| Alsatians | 11.3 /100 | #210  | Poor 9.6%  | 
| Malaysians | 10.6 /100 | #211  | Poor 9.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 9.7 /100 | #212  | Tragic 9.7%  | 
| Osage | 8.0 /100 | #213  | Tragic 9.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 6.7 /100 | #214  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 6.7 /100 | #215  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Moroccans | 6.5 /100 | #216  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Americans | 6.2 /100 | #217  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Panamanians | 5.6 /100 | #218  | Tragic 9.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 5.4 /100 | #219  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
| Bermudans | 5.3 /100 | #220  | Tragic 9.9%  | 
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Ghana (10.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Mexican American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Chickasaw (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Liberia (10.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty | 
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251  | Tragic 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252  | Tragic 10.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253  | Tragic 10.7%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257  | Tragic 10.8%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264  | Tragic 10.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 10.9%  |