Iroquois vs Zimbabwean Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Iroquois
Zimbabwean
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Iroquois
Zimbabweans
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
47.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Zimbabwean Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,192,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082 and weighted average of 47.4%, a difference of 8.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iroquois | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 9.6% | 25.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 84.6% |
Range | 90.4% | 58.9% |
Mean | 45.4% | 51.5% |
Median | 46.1% | 49.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.2% | 43.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.1% | 59.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.2% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 17.0% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Venezuela (47.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (47.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (47.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Celtic (47.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
French Canadians | 92.4 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Chileans | 92.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Okinawans | 90.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.3 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
Zimbabweans | 89.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
Australians | 89.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
Pakistanis | 88.6 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.3% |
Celtics | 88.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 87.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 87.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 87.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |