Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Chinese
45.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
15.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Chinese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,726,431 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 45.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%, a difference of 10.2%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Chinese |
Minimum | 24.8% | 35.3% |
Maximum | 73.1% | 63.0% |
Range | 48.3% | 27.8% |
Mean | 48.9% | 50.6% |
Median | 49.5% | 51.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.5% | 46.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.6% | 56.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.1% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Potawatomi (45.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Carpatho Rusyn (45.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Central America (45.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Alaska Native (45.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Aleut (45.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |
Alaska Natives | 13.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 45.6% |
Aleuts | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 45.6% |
Nepalese | 11.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 45.6% |
Uruguayans | 10.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 45.5% |
Immigrants | France | 8.8 /100 | #207 | Tragic 45.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 8.7 /100 | #208 | Tragic 45.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |