Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Sri Lankan
Disability
Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Sri Lankans
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
69th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,510,650 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.74%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26eff/26effc609be68dd15003852dca095dbbcfee76c5" alt="Zimbabwean vs Sri Lankan Disability"
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Sri Lankan |
Minimum | 4.5% | 4.1% |
Maximum | 21.8% | 31.3% |
Range | 17.3% | 27.2% |
Mean | 11.1% | 11.8% |
Median | 10.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 11.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Sri Lankans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from France (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Lebanon (11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Chile (11.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.0% |