Zimbabwean vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Chinese
81.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,208,654 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.416 and weighted average of 81.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,809,125 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.452 and weighted average of 80.7%, a difference of 0.35%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Chinese |
| Minimum | 65.2% | 51.7% |
| Maximum | 88.9% | 86.2% |
| Range | 23.7% | 34.5% |
| Mean | 81.1% | 79.0% |
| Median | 81.7% | 80.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 79.5% | 77.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.0% | 83.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 5.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (81.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Norwegian (81.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Thai (80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (80.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Nepal (81.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Brazil (80.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ireland (80.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Lithuania (80.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Poland (80.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (80.7%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 81.1% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 81.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 81.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 81.0% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 80.9% |
| Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 80.9% |
| Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 80.8% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 80.7% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 80.6% |
| Paraguayans | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 80.6% |