Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from El Salvador
Disability
Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from El Salvador
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
60th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.9%
DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,588 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,766,367 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.627 and weighted average of 10.9%, a difference of 0.57%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 21.8% | 13.9% |
| Range | 17.3% | 9.3% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 9.6% |
| Median | 10.7% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 2.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 2.0% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from El Salvador by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Bulgaria (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Colombia (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (10.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Eritrea (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from South America (10.9%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Spain (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (10.9%, a difference of 0.090%), South American (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lithuania (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Peruvian (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Soviet Union | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Vietnamese | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Peruvians | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.7 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |