Zimbabwean vs Australian Disability Age 5 to 17
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Australian
Disability Age 5 to 17
Disability Age 5 to 17 Comparison
Zimbabweans
Australians
5.5%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
67.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
DISABILITY AGE 5 TO 17
78.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Australian Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,117,127 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.104 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,865,567 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 5 and 17 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.75%.
Disability Age 5 to 17 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Australian |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.74% |
Maximum | 15.2% | 23.0% |
Range | 14.7% | 22.2% |
Mean | 5.6% | 8.0% |
Median | 5.3% | 6.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.6% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 10.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Australians by Disability Age 5 to 17
In terms of disability age 5 to 17, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (5.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Scotland (5.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Lebanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and Greek (5.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Ecuador (5.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Hawaiian (5.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Nepal (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 5 to 17 |
Samoans | 81.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 5.5% |
Central Americans | 81.6 /100 | #149 | Excellent 5.5% |
Guatemalans | 81.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 5.5% |
Estonians | 80.8 /100 | #151 | Excellent 5.5% |
Ute | 80.6 /100 | #152 | Excellent 5.5% |
Ecuadorians | 79.7 /100 | #153 | Good 5.5% |
Australians | 78.8 /100 | #154 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 78.3 /100 | #155 | Good 5.5% |
Hawaiians | 78.0 /100 | #156 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 77.9 /100 | #157 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 77.1 /100 | #158 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 75.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.5% |
South Africans | 73.3 /100 | #160 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 69.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.5% |
Zimbabweans | 67.2 /100 | #162 | Good 5.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 64.0 /100 | #163 | Good 5.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 61.9 /100 | #164 | Good 5.6% |
Lebanese | 61.4 /100 | #165 | Good 5.6% |
Greeks | 60.6 /100 | #166 | Good 5.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 59.3 /100 | #167 | Average 5.6% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #168 | Average 5.6% |