Tsimshian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Alaskan Athabascan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Alaskan Athabascans
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,813,116 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 1.6%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c700/0c700d9e32fc62cf70b55c509c341f8df3613392" alt="Tsimshian vs Alaskan Athabascan Vision Disability"
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 1.6% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 5.5% | 16.7% |
Range | 3.9% | 16.4% |
Mean | 3.8% | 4.9% |
Median | 3.5% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.2% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Alaskan Athabascans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (3.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and Cheyenne (3.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |