Tlingit-Haida vs African Female Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
African
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Africans
13.2%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs African Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,854,290 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.605 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,943,278 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.7%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | African |
| Minimum | 8.2% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 34.5% | 34.2% |
| Range | 26.2% | 28.4% |
| Mean | 15.5% | 17.0% |
| Median | 13.7% | 16.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.8% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.3% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Africans by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Yemen (13.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Shoshone (13.2%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (13.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Yakama (13.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Yaqui (13.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Scotch-Irish (13.4%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Portugal (13.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Micronesia (13.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Pennsylvania German (13.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 13.3% |
| French | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 13.5% |