South African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Male Disability
COMPARE
South African
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
South Africans
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
81.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,590,861 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,818,350 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.222 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.15%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | South African | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 25.0% | 20.5% |
| Range | 22.3% | 17.4% |
| Mean | 11.6% | 10.7% |
| Median | 10.8% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.7% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Nigerian (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sudan (11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Europe (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Ugandan (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 82.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Nigerians | 81.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 11.0% |
| South Africans | 81.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 81.5 /100 | #140 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Arabs | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 81.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Moroccans | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Kenyans | 78.1 /100 | #144 | Good 11.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 78.0 /100 | #145 | Good 11.0% |
| Koreans | 77.5 /100 | #146 | Good 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 77.3 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |