South African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Households
COMPARE
South African
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
South Africans
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
227th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Trinidadian and Tobagonian Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,946 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,716,618 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 63.6%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Trinidadian and Tobagonian |
Minimum | 40.0% | 51.4% |
Maximum | 96.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.0% | 48.6% |
Mean | 68.7% | 68.4% |
Median | 65.1% | 67.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 62.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.0% | 74.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Turkish (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (63.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Bulgarian (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |