Romanian vs Immigrants from Zaire Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
 Immigrants from Zaire
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Romanians
Immigrants from Zaire
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
83.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
139th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Immigrants from Zaire Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,793,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,247,600 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.070%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Immigrants from Zaire | 
| Minimum | 1.00% | 2.5% | 
| Maximum | 39.7% | 32.2% | 
| Range | 38.7% | 29.6% | 
| Mean | 8.7% | 6.9% | 
| Median | 6.2% | 5.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 6.4% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 1.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Zaire by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Immigrants from Hungary (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% | 
| Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% | 
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |