Romanian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Romanians
Immigrants from Costa Rica
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,793,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,267,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.239 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.77%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
Minimum | 1.00% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 39.7% | 14.6% |
Range | 38.7% | 13.0% |
Mean | 8.7% | 5.7% |
Median | 6.2% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 6.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |