Romanian vs Ghanaian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
Ghanaian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Romanians
Ghanaians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
157th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Ghanaian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,793,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,643,390 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.91%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Ghanaian |
| Minimum | 1.00% | 0.61% |
| Maximum | 39.7% | 15.7% |
| Range | 38.7% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 5.8% |
| Median | 6.2% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 2.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Ghanaians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |