Romanian vs Syrian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Romanian
Syrian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Romanians
Syrians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
75.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Syrian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,793,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.469 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 266,278,347 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Syrians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.62%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Romanian | Syrian |
Minimum | 1.00% | 0.77% |
Maximum | 39.7% | 15.6% |
Range | 38.7% | 14.8% |
Mean | 8.7% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.2% | 5.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 7.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 3.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Romanians and Syrians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Syrians are Immigrants from Croatia (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |