Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Pima
 Immigrants from Belarus
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Belarus
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 36.2%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Immigrants from Belarus | 
| Minimum | 3.8% | 0.54% | 
| Maximum | 29.5% | 19.6% | 
| Range | 25.7% | 19.0% | 
| Mean | 11.0% | 6.2% | 
| Median | 8.6% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 3.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% | 
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% | 
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% | 
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% | 
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% | 
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% | 
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% | 
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |