Pima vs Immigrants from Australia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Australia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Australia
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Immigrants from Australia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,976 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.427 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 51.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 29.5% | 15.9% |
| Range | 25.7% | 14.9% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 6.8% |
| Median | 8.6% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 3.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Pakistan (5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Venezuela (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Turkey (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Asia (5.5%, a difference of 0.28%), and Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |