Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Immigrants from Belarus
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ecuadorians
Immigrants from Belarus
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,738,990 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.51%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 19.6% |
| Range | 8.8% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 5.6% | 6.2% |
| Median | 5.7% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.5% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Immigrants from Oceania (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |