Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Immigrants from Belarus
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Immigrants from Belarus
6.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,483,943 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 6.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 10.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Immigrants from Belarus |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.54% |
| Maximum | 12.1% | 19.6% |
| Range | 10.2% | 19.0% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.2% |
| Median | 6.5% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 4.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 3.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Slovak (6.7%, a difference of 0.10%), French (6.6%, a difference of 0.26%), French Canadian (6.7%, a difference of 0.36%), White/Caucasian (6.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Spanish (6.6%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Nepalese | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Spanish | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 6.6% |
| French | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Slovaks | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 6.7% |
| French Canadians | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Sioux | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |