Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
 Immigrants from Belarus
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Belarus
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
3.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,636,980 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721 and weighted average of 6.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 5.4%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Belarus | 
| Minimum | 0.94% | 0.54% | 
| Maximum | 50.5% | 19.6% | 
| Range | 49.6% | 19.0% | 
| Mean | 10.8% | 6.2% | 
| Median | 7.7% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.0% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 3.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Portuguese (6.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.26%), and Slavic (6.4%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225  | Tragic 6.3%  | 
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236  | Tragic 6.4%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168  | Good 6.1%  |