Pima vs Yup'ik Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Pima
 Yup'ik
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Pima
Yup'ik
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Yup'ik Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,959,471 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.364 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 59.9%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Yup'ik | 
| Minimum | 3.8% | 0.68% | 
| Maximum | 29.5% | 14.6% | 
| Range | 25.7% | 13.9% | 
| Mean | 11.0% | 5.8% | 
| Median | 8.6% | 5.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 4.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 6.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 2.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 2.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Pima by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 7.8%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 8.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 8.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 8.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 8.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 9.3%  | 
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Iranian (5.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 1.6%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 4.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 4.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 5.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 5.0%  | 
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 5.1%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 5.1%  | 
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 5.1%  | 
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 5.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 5.2%  | 
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16  | Exceptional 5.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17  | Exceptional 5.4%  |