Danish vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Danish
 Immigrants from Belarus
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Danes
Immigrants from Belarus
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
69.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Danish vs Immigrants from Belarus Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 473,952,893 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Danes and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,188,321 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Danish | Immigrants from Belarus | 
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.54% | 
| Maximum | 51.6% | 19.6% | 
| Range | 50.4% | 19.0% | 
| Mean | 7.5% | 6.2% | 
| Median | 6.1% | 5.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.5% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.7% | 3.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 3.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Danes by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Danes are Immigrants from Colombia (5.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (5.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Netherlands (5.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Colombian (5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and Uruguayan (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| New Zealanders | 97.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| Immigrants | Morocco | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| Uruguayans | 97.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| Colombians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 97.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| Immigrants | Colombia | 96.7 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| Danes | 96.6 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.8% | 
| South Africans | 96.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.9% | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 95.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.9% | 
| Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% | 
| South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% | 
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% | 
| Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Latvia (6.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Nigerian (6.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% | 
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% | 
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% | 
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% | 
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% | 
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% | 
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% | 
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% | 
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% | 
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |