Pima vs Cherokee Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Pima
 Cherokee
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Pima
Cherokee
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Cherokee Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.261 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,453,063 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.363 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 4.7%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Cherokee | 
| Minimum | 3.8% | 3.1% | 
| Maximum | 29.5% | 33.3% | 
| Range | 25.7% | 30.2% | 
| Mean | 11.0% | 12.6% | 
| Median | 8.6% | 11.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 9.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 14.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 4.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 4.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.2% | 4.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Pima and Cherokee by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 0.83%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Menominee (7.8%, a difference of 0.89%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 0.94%), Cajun (7.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Chickasaw (8.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326  | Tragic 7.5%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327  | Tragic 7.5%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 7.6%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 7.6%  | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 7.7%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 7.8%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 7.8%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 8.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 8.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 8.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 8.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 9.3%  |