Nonimmigrants vs Chinese Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
Chinese
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Nonimmigrants
Chinese
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.6%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
2.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs Chinese Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 581,524,838 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 2.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,357 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.418 and weighted average of 2.6%, a difference of 2.8%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | Chinese |
| Minimum | 0.58% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 8.7% | 8.0% |
| Range | 8.1% | 7.4% |
| Mean | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Median | 2.5% | 2.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.36% | 0.82% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.84% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.84% | 1.3% |
Similar Demographics by Self-Care Disability
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Potawatomi (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Belarus (2.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Chippewa (2.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Arapaho (2.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Central America (2.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.3 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chippewa | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.2 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 0.2 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.7% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Philippines (2.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guatemalan (2.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (2.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Guamanian/Chamorro (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (2.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 4.0 /100 | #219 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.0 /100 | #220 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Hondurans | 3.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Spaniards | 3.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 2.6% |
| French Canadians | 3.8 /100 | #223 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Osage | 3.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Iraqis | 3.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Chinese | 2.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 2.7 /100 | #227 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guatemalans | 2.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 2.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 2.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 2.2 /100 | #231 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 2.6% |
| Liberians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 2.6% |