African vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
African
Immigrants from Oceania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Africans
Immigrants from Oceania
7.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,824,822 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.034 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 14.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 27.3% | 20.2% |
| Range | 25.7% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 9.7% | 8.5% |
| Median | 8.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 4.2% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Armenia (7.0%, a difference of 0.060%), British West Indian (7.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Marshallese (6.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Puget Sound Salish (6.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (7.0%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.9% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.9% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 7.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |