Mongolian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mongolian
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mongolians
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,347,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,792,147 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Mongolian | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 9.8% | 24.9% |
| Range | 8.7% | 24.5% |
| Mean | 5.2% | 7.1% |
| Median | 5.2% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 7.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Venezuelan (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Paraguayan (5.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (5.5%, a difference of 0.73%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Inupiat (5.6%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.46%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |