Mongolian vs Venezuelan Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Mongolian
Venezuelan
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Mongolians
Venezuelans
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Mongolian vs Venezuelan Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,347,726 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 306,237,534 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Venezuelans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235 and weighted average of 5.5%, a difference of 0.080%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Mongolian | Venezuelan |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 9.8% | 17.1% |
Range | 8.7% | 16.5% |
Mean | 5.2% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Mongolians and Venezuelans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.42%), Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.51%), Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Venezuelans are Argentinean (5.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.34%), Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.43%), Cypriot (5.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (5.5%, a difference of 0.45%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |