Kiowa vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Kiowa
 Immigrants from Oceania
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Kiowa
Immigrants from Oceania
8.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,098,289 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 41.5%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Immigrants from Oceania | 
| Minimum | 5.0% | 1.6% | 
| Maximum | 24.2% | 20.2% | 
| Range | 19.2% | 18.6% | 
| Mean | 12.0% | 8.5% | 
| Median | 11.4% | 7.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 9.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 3.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 4.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 4.2% | 
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Tohono O'odham (8.7%, a difference of 1.5%), Creek (8.5%, a difference of 1.9%), Tsimshian (8.8%, a difference of 2.5%), Puerto Rican (8.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 8.0%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 8.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 8.3%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 8.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 8.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 8.7%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 8.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 8.9%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 9.3%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 9.5%  | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160  | Good 6.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168  | Good 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173  | Average 6.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174  | Average 6.1%  |