Maltese vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Maltese
Immigrants from Oceania
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Maltese
Immigrants from Oceania
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
81.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
60.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Maltese vs Immigrants from Oceania Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,465,300 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Maltese and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,408,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.348 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Maltese | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 15.2% | 20.2% |
| Range | 13.2% | 18.6% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 8.5% |
| Median | 6.1% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Maltese and Immigrants from Oceania by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Maltese are Lithuanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Greek (6.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Austria (6.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and Syrian (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Ecuadorian (6.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Iraqi (6.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Nicaraguan (6.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Basque (6.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and Lebanese (6.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |