Latvian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Subsaharan African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Latvians
Sub-Saharan Africans
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,706,558 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.491 and weighted average of 5.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,846,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 11.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.23% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 28.4% | 27.3% |
| Range | 28.1% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 7.3% | 8.3% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.8% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 5.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Germany (6.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |