Soviet Union vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Subsaharan African
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Sub-Saharan Africans
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,846,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 11.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 2.6% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 10.8% | 27.3% |
Range | 8.2% | 25.7% |
Mean | 5.3% | 8.3% |
Median | 5.7% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 8.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 4.9% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sudan (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 98.6 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 98.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Kenyans | 98.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 98.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Hispanic or Latino (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Dutch (6.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Germany (6.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% |
Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% |
Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% |
Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% |
Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 6.4% |
Dutch | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Germany | 1.8 /100 | #237 | Tragic 6.4% |
Haitians | 1.8 /100 | #238 | Tragic 6.4% |
Senegalese | 1.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 6.4% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 6.4% |