Canadian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Canadian
 Subsaharan African
 Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Canadians
Sub-Saharan Africans
6.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
10.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Subsaharan African Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,391,973 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.333 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,846,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.307 and weighted average of 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%.
 
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Subsaharan African | 
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.5% | 
| Maximum | 38.9% | 27.3% | 
| Range | 37.8% | 25.7% | 
| Mean | 11.4% | 8.3% | 
| Median | 7.7% | 6.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.6% | 8.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.6% | 2.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 5.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 4.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Sub-Saharan Africans by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Yugoslavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Latin America (6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Mexico (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (6.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Indonesian (6.3%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Liberia (6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (6.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (6.4%, a difference of 0.40%), Mexican (6.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and Czechoslovakian (6.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 11.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 11.0 /100 | #215 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Canadians | 10.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Yugoslavians | 10.9 /100 | #217 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 6.3% | 
| Indonesians | 9.9 /100 | #219 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 9.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Hungarians | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| German Russians | 9.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Immigrants | Honduras | 7.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Liberians | 7.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Hondurans | 6.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 6.3% | 
| Slavs | 5.1 /100 | #226 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Cubans | 4.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Portuguese | 4.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Czechoslovakians | 3.8 /100 | #229 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Mexicans | 3.5 /100 | #230 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Panamanians | 3.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 2.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 6.4% | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 6.4% |