Iranian vs Thai Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Iranian
Thai
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Iranians
Thais
5.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Thai Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,801,609 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.165 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,631,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324 and weighted average of 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Thai |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.18% |
| Maximum | 19.5% | 8.6% |
| Range | 17.7% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 5.4% | 4.0% |
| Median | 4.7% | 4.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.5% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 1.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Thais by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Yup'ik (5.2%, a difference of 0.60%), Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Taiwan (4.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Filipino (4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Singapore (5.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Bolivia (5.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and Bolivian (5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |