Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ugandan Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ugandan
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ugandans
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
93.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ugandan Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,811,453 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 41.0% | 26.2% |
| Range | 39.5% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 14.2% | 11.8% |
| Median | 11.0% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.4% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.9% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.1% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ugandans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.8%, a difference of 0.24%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |