Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ugandan Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ugandan
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Ugandans
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
91.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Ugandan Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,800,208 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,002,961 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.25%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 0.51% |
| Maximum | 6.8% | 7.2% |
| Range | 6.2% | 6.7% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.7% | 1.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Ugandans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Uganda (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Scotland (2.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Ukraine (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Albania (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |