Immigrants from South Africa vs Ugandan Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Africa
Ugandan
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from South Africa
Ugandans
10.8%
MALE DISABILITY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Africa vs Ugandan Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,300,500 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%.

Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Africa | Ugandan |
Minimum | 0.92% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 30.0% | 26.2% |
Range | 29.0% | 24.7% |
Mean | 13.2% | 11.8% |
Median | 12.0% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa and Ugandans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Immigrants from Barbados (10.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Eastern European (10.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Philippines (10.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Central Americans | 92.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |