Immigrants from Africa vs Ugandan Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Ugandan
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Ugandans
10.9%
MALE DISABILITY
89.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE DISABILITY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Ugandan Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,296,283 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,018,576 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 0.69%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 26.3% | 26.2% |
| Range | 23.9% | 24.7% |
| Mean | 11.0% | 11.8% |
| Median | 10.4% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 13.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa and Ugandans by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cuba (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Armenian (10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.9%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Bhutanese (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (11.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 91.8 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Eastern Europeans | 90.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 90.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Armenians | 90.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 89.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.2 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
| South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
| Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |